As reported on my favorite news website, Flumesday.com, the Thai government has blocked the website, www.youtube.com, for a video on the site making fun of the King of Thailand, Adulyadej Bhumibol. In the video (or so I've read as I'm unable to view it) the King is shown as a clown, then drinking beer, and worst of all, is shown with a pair of women's feet above his head. This is hardly a big deal to any westerners who in all likelihood enjoy seeing our world leaders as the butt of jokes, but this does not fly in Thailand.
The censorship comes from the interim government that took over in a coup last September but I'm sure that the entire country would have taken offense had they seen it. The reason why has to do with history and the pride Thai people have in their country.
As of late, since the video was first posted, Youtube has decided to take the video off the website but the Thai government has still refused to unblock the site, citing that the leading pic of the video clip remains.
So why is all of this a big deal to Thais? First it has to do with their past.
Despite Europeans traveling to Thailand as early as the 16th century, the country remains the sole South East Asian country not to be colonized. As each of the bordering countries (Laos, Burma, and Cambodia) struggled through European rule, According to Thais, their country remained independent predominantly because of the strong and clever rule by their great Kings, keeping them between (and not under) the British and the French. Still, without being occupied, Thailand was influenced by the western world, challenging many of their customs and ideas.
The 'westernization' began with simple things such as bicycles, western clothing, and other trade goods (perhaps moustaches?). Traditional Thai dress drifted out of style, as well as chewing betel nut (white teeth became beautiful, instead of the red stained teeth from chewing betel nut.) Thais began to travel to Europe to work and to study (each of the last 5 Kings have traveled abroad and the current King was actually born in Cambridge, Massachusettes.) In the early 20th century, studying abroad meant the introduction of politics, namely democracy, to Thais. The ideas of voting and poltical parties were, by some, seen as a way of equalizing Thailand with the powerful west. Eventually a group overtook the King in a bloodless coup, ending the absolute monarchy and beginning what Thais call "democracy."
Since the end of the instituion of Thai government, politics have been less than smooth, enduring nearly 20 coups and 17 constitutions (the newest version is currently being written.) This break from the past and move towards a mess of "western" politics has left Thais less than interested in the government. Their interest is instead more focused on the current Royal Family and their social developmental projects. Though highly propagated (the King's picture is in every home, at every intersection, and everyone owns and often wears official yellow shirts in his honor) the King appears to deserve the praise he gets (I must say appears because it's impossible to find a dissenting opinion out here. Though a recently published book, "The King Never Smiles" has been banned in Thailand because of its critical look at the King.)
Despite its rocky past, Thailand stands politically proud amongst its neighbors. Burma has been under the suffocating grip of an isolationist military dictatorship, Cambodia's government is paralyzed by corruption in its slow recovery from the horrific rule of Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge, and The People's Democratic Republic of Laos (actually a socialist republic) was the victim of the "secret" half of the Vietnam war and remains much poorer than Thailand. Looking around at its neighbors, Thailand feels strong as a nation and they attribute it to the good of the people and the work of the King.
The current King and his grandfather, King Rama V, are the symbols of the Thailand's pride in it's culture, its people, its history. Even the red, white and blue stripes on their flag stand for Nation, Buddhism and the King. King Rama V is seen as the last great King before the introduction of western ideas and the slow decline in Thai culture and traditions. Today's King (Rama V's grandson) is highly revered as one who has committed his life to preserving this way of life and through his leadership and development programs.
Okay, so the King's a good guy and doesn't deserve to be made fun of, but so what, right? It's just a joke, and as I hear, a weak one at that. But we in the west still have something to learn about offending more sensitive religions or cultures. Sure, we have a bumbling leader who people roast on a daily basis, but not long ago chaos ensued after Danish cartoonists drew political cartoons of the prophet Mohammed. I didn't even understand most of the cartoons but they struck a chord in some of the world's Muslims and there were riots. Of course, no matter how offensive the cartoons, riots and deaths are an unaccepable reaction but it is still indicative of the ignorance between cultures.
This ignorance can at times easily offend without intending (or, in this case, fully intending but only as a joke) to do so. In my school in the north of Thailand, I had students that would say, "fuck you" to me, having no idea what it meant. They played it off as cool, just using some awesome slang they had picked up from a movie. When they said it they had no idea what kind of meanings were attached to the word. They didn't understand how harsh and rude it was, especially being said from a student at a teacher. At the same time I can utter horribly offensive Thai words without feeling a tiny bit of anything attached to them while the people around me gasp in horror of hearing the word.
In the end those of us in America and other parts of the world are just less sensitive about these matters. We can brush off a bad joke, an offensive t-shirt or a video without too much thought (or at least we retain our right to free speech and can offend whoever we like.) But over here jokes about the King aren't funny, or taken lightly. You can be arrested for even saying anything bad about him or the Royal Family. To them, it is like making fun of Buddha or Mohammed or Christ. In that sense, the equivalent of women's feet over the King's head is like defecating on Jesus Christ an image that, if made onto a video, would surely spawn a free speech argument in America (see: Current Supreme Court case on "Bong Hits for Jesus." Check out the Flumesday.com article here.)
Still, don't expect any big uproar from Thailand. There won't be any response out here because no one out here looks at youtube.com other than teeny-bopper girls trying to catch music videos of the hot new Korean boy bands and a small handful of Flumesday readers.